KQo vs JTs king-queen offsuit against jack-ten suited
All-in before the flop, king-queen offsuit wins 60.6% of boards, jack-ten suited wins 38.7%, and 0.7% split the pot. KQo is a 1.56 to 1 favourite. These are not samples: the engine dealt every one of the 1,712,304 possible five-card boards for each of the 3 ways the suits can line up, and the working is below.
Equity counts a split pot as half a win for each side, which is why the two equities add to 100% and the two win rates do not.
Two higher cards against two lower cards
Neither hand is made. The higher cards win most boards where nothing happens, or where both hands pair one card. The lower hand wins when it pairs and the higher one does not, or makes a straight or flush, so suited and connected lower cards do noticeably better than their ranks suggest.
Suits change it by 1.36 points
There are 48 ways to deal KQo against JTs without the two hands sharing a card, and they fall into 3 patterns once you ignore which suit is which. Best case for KQo is 61.62% (for example K♣Q♦ against J♣T♣), worst is 60.25% (K♣Q♦ against J♥T♥). The headline number is the average over all 48, weighted by how many deals share each pattern.
| Example deal | Suits in common | Deals like it | KQo wins | Split | JTs wins | KQo equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K♣Q♦ vs J♣T♣ | K–J, K–T | 12 of 48 | 1,048,855 | 12,437 | 651,012 | 61.62% |
| K♣Q♦ vs J♦T♦ | Q–J, Q–T | 12 of 48 | 1,047,838 | 12,438 | 652,028 | 61.56% |
| K♣Q♦ vs J♥T♥ | none | 24 of 48 | 1,026,206 | 11,075 | 675,023 | 60.25% |
Click any deal to run it in the equity calculator, which counts the same boards in your browser, or add a third hand, a flop or a dead card to it.
How each hand wins
The made hand the winner shows down with, as a share of all boards. KQo wins most often with pair (28.5% of boards); JTs with two pair (11.1%). Splits happen when both hands play the same five cards or make the same hand, mostly straights.
| Made hand | KQo wins with it | JTs wins with it | Split with it |
|---|---|---|---|
| High card | 5.58% | 0.00% | – |
| Pair | 28.51% | 9.88% | – |
| Two pair | 15.82% | 11.08% | 0.22% |
| Three of a kind | 3.74% | 3.05% | – |
| Straight | 2.71% | 6.59% | 0.25% |
| Flush | 1.83% | 5.79% | 0.11% |
| Full house | 2.23% | 2.07% | 0.10% |
| Four of a kind | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
| Straight flush | 0.01% | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| Total | 60.58% | 38.74% | 0.69% |
When calling with JTs is right
If you call an all-in of S with JTs and know you are up against exactly KQo, you win 39.08% of a pot that holds 2S plus whatever dead money D was already in the middle (blinds, antes, earlier bets). Calling breaks even when 39.08% × (2S + D) = S, so D ÷ S = 1 ÷ 0.3908 − 2 = 0.559. A 10 bb shove needs at least 5.6 bb of dead money before calling it with JTs stops losing chips. Nobody shows you their hand, though: against a real shove you are calling a range, and the push/fold charts already account for it.
Open this as a spot: JTs (dealt as J♥T♥, the most common suit pattern) facing a 10 bb all-in with 2.5 bb already in the middle, against a range of exactly KQo. The calculator samples runouts rather than dealing all of them, so expect its equity to land within a few tenths of a point of the exact figure for that deal. Change the pot, the bet or the range and it reprices.
Each hand has its own page with its equity against all 169 starting hands and its push/fold range at every stack depth.
More with KQo or JTs
| Matchup | First hand | Split | Second hand | Equity bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KQo vs JJ | 43.5% | 0.4% | 56.5% | |
| JTs vs 99 | 48.8% | 0.4% | 51.2% | |
| JTs vs 22 | 53.8% | 1.4% | 46.2% | |
| AA vs JTs | 78.8% | 0.4% | 21.2% | |
| QQ vs JTs | 81.7% | 0.4% | 18.3% | |
| AKo vs KQo | 74.8% | 1.2% | 25.2% | |
| AQo vs KQo | 74.5% | 1.1% | 25.5% | |
| KQo vs KJo | 74.0% | 5.6% | 26.0% |
Other overs vs unders matchups
| Matchup | First hand | Split | Second hand | Equity bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKo vs QJs | 61.1% | 0.5% | 38.9% | |
| AKo vs JTs | 59.5% | 0.5% | 40.5% | |
| AKo vs T9s | 59.5% | 0.4% | 40.5% | |
| AKo vs 87s | 58.8% | 0.4% | 41.2% | |
| AKo vs 72o | 67.6% | 0.5% | 32.4% | |
| AQo vs JTs | 59.7% | 0.5% | 40.3% |
- Exhaustive, not sampled. With four cards dealt, 48 remain, and there are C(48, 5) = 1,712,304 five-card boards. For each suit pattern our Rust engine (the same WebAssembly file the trainer runs) evaluated both seven-card hands on every board and counted wins, splits and losses. The board counts in the suit table are exact; anyone with an enumerator can reproduce them digit for digit.
- Suit patterns. Two deals are the same pattern when one becomes the other by renaming suits (clubs to hearts, say), which cannot change who wins. Each pattern is enumerated once and weighted by how many of the 48 deals it stands for.
- Cross-check. The site's independent Monte Carlo matrix (200,000 random boards per matchup, used on the starting-hand pages) has KQo at 60.88% here, 0.04 points from the exact figure. The build fails if any matchup disagrees by more than 0.4 points.
- All-in preflop only. This is the equity when the money goes in before the flop and five cards are dealt with no more decisions. It says nothing about how the hands play when there is betting left.
- Raw data: kqo-vs-jts.json and the summary matchups.json, built by
tools/build-matchups.mjs.